NLRB Finds Merit in Union Accusations Against Amazon and Starbucks

Indicating that federal labor officials are closely monitoring management behavior during the federal campaign, the National Labor Relations Board said Friday that it found legitimacy in allegations that Amazon and Starbucks violated labor laws.

At Amazon, the Labor Board was found guilty of requiring workers to attend an anti-union meeting at a large Staten Island warehouse where the Amazon Labor Union won a landslide victory last month. According to Seth Goldstein, a lawyer representing the union, the union was informed of the decision Friday by an attorney for the regional office of the Labor Board in Brooklyn.

Such meetings, often referred to as “captive audience” meetings, are legal under the current Labor Board hypothesis. But last month, the board’s general counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, issued a memo stating that the example contradicted federal law, and indicated she would try to challenge it.

In a similar filing of allegations, Amazon Labor Union accused the company of threatening to withhold benefits from employees if they voted to join the union, and inaccurately hinting to employees that they would be fired if the warehouse formed a union and they failed to pay the union. will be done. According to an email from Attorney at the Credit Regional Office, Matt Jackson, the Labor Board was also found guilty of the charges.

Mr. Jackson said the agency would soon issue a complaint reflecting those allegations until Amazon settles the case. The complaint will be filed before an administrative law judge, whose decision could be appealed to the Labor Board in Washington.

Mr. Ms. Goldstein. Abruzzo and the regional office said they would “take decisive action to end necessary captive audience meetings” and said “Amazon’s right to union will be protected by ending its inherently coercive work practices.”

“This is false and we look forward to seeing it through the process,” Amazon spokeswoman Kelly Nantell said in a statement.

At Starbucks, where the union has won preliminary votes in more than 50 stores since December, the labor board on Friday issued a complaint alleging a series of lawsuits filed by the union, most of which in February accused the company of illegal behavior. Those allegations include dismissal of employees in retaliation for supporting the union; Threatening employees’ ability to get new benefits if they choose to unionize; As a way to forcibly evict at least one union supporter, workers need to be available for at least hours to continue working at the unified store, without bargaining for change; And effectively promises them benefits if they decide not to unionize.

In addition to those on board, the Labor Board was justified in alleging that the company had intimidated workers by closing Buffalo-Area stores and was involved in supervising workers while they were working. All those actions would be illegal.

In a statement, Starbucks Workers United, a branch of the union representing workers there, said the findings “confirm the extent and extent of Starbucks’ conduct in western New York.” Forced to walk in the fight. “

Starbucks said in a statement that the complaint does not constitute a judgment by the Labor Board, adding, “We believe the board involved in the complaint is incorrect, and we are eager to present our evidence when the judgment is reached.”

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.